↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. [...]Ruskin attempted a methodological/scientific critique of political economy. He fixed on ideas of ‘natural laws’, ‘economic man’ and the prevailing notion of ‘value’ to point out gaps and inconsistencies in the system of classical economics.
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Jönsson, Dan. “John Ruskin: En brittisk 1800-talsaristokrat för vår tid? - OBS”. sverigesradio.se (bằng tiếng Thụy Điển). Sveriges Radio. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 5 tháng 3 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 2021. Den klassiska nationalekonomin, som den utarbetats av John Stuart Mill, Adam Smith och David Ricardo, betraktade han som en sorts kollektivt hjärnsläpp ... [Transl. Ruskin viewed the classical political economy as it was developed by Mill, Smith, and Ricardo, as a kind of "collective mental lapse.]
↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. [...]Ruskin attempted a methodological/scientific critique of political economy. He fixed on ideas of ‘natural laws’, ‘economic man’ and the prevailing notion of ‘value’ to point out gaps and inconsistencies in the system of classical economics.
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Ruccio, David (10 tháng 12 năm 2020). “Toward a critique of political economy | MR Online”. mronline.org. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 15 tháng 12 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 20 tháng 9 năm 2021. Marx arrives at conclusions and formulates new terms that run directly counter to those of Smith, Ricardo, and the other classical political economists.
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Jönsson, Dan. “John Ruskin: En brittisk 1800-talsaristokrat för vår tid? - OBS”. sverigesradio.se (bằng tiếng Thụy Điển). Sveriges Radio. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 5 tháng 3 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 2021. Den klassiska nationalekonomin, som den utarbetats av John Stuart Mill, Adam Smith och David Ricardo, betraktade han som en sorts kollektivt hjärnsläpp ... [Transl. Ruskin viewed the classical political economy as it was developed by Mill, Smith, and Ricardo, as a kind of "collective mental lapse.]
↑ Jönsson, Dan. “John Ruskin: En brittisk 1800-talsaristokrat för vår tid? - OBS”. sverigesradio.se (bằng tiếng Thụy Điển). Sveriges Radio. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 5 tháng 3 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 2021. Den klassiska nationalekonomin, som den utarbetats av John Stuart Mill, Adam Smith och David Ricardo, betraktade han som en sorts kollektivt hjärnsläpp ... [Transl. Ruskin viewed the classical political economy as it was developed by Mill, Smith, and Ricardo, as a kind of "collective mental lapse.]
↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. [...]Ruskin attempted a methodological/scientific critique of political economy. He fixed on ideas of ‘natural laws’, ‘economic man’ and the prevailing notion of ‘value’ to point out gaps and inconsistencies in the system of classical economics.
↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. tr. 100. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. Ruskin’s criticism of Mill is that he based the science of political economy on ‘the opinions of the public’ as expressed by market prices, i.e. on ‘fuddled’ thought induced by contemplating the shadow of value rather than thinking upon, by implication, a true (Platonic) object of cognition.
↑ Liedman, Sven-Eric. “Engelsismen” (PDF). Fronesis (bằng tiếng Thụy Điển) (28): 134. Engels var också först med att kritiskt bearbeta den nya nationalekonomin; hans "Utkast till en kritik av nationalekonomin" kom ut 1844 och blev en utgångspunkt för Marx egen kritik av den politiska ekonomin [Engels was the first to critically engage the new political economy his Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy came out in 1844 and became a starting point for Marx's own critique of the political economy]
↑ Jung, Henrik (1 tháng 1 năm 2019). “Slagen av abstraktioner: Förnuftiga och reala abstraktioner i Marx ekonomikritik”. Lychnos: Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria (bằng tiếng Thụy Điển). ISSN0076-1648. Marx consistently reveals the social abstraction of the substance of value and capital, i.e. abstract labour, as a Realabstraktion dominating individuals in bourgeois society through money and capital.
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Fareld, Victoria; Kuch, Hannes (9 tháng 1 năm 2020). From Marx to Hegel and back capitalism, critique, and utopia. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Bloomsbury Academic. tr. 150, 143. ISBN978-1-350-08268-7. OCLC1141198381.
↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. It could be argued that Ruskin, like Plato, is addressing the problems of society as a whole rather than addressing economic issues. Nonetheless, he approaches such concerns through a critique of political economy.
↑ Ruccio, David (10 tháng 12 năm 2020). “Toward a critique of political economy | MR Online”. mronline.org. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 15 tháng 12 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 20 tháng 9 năm 2021. Marx arrives at conclusions and formulates new terms that run directly counter to those of Smith, Ricardo, and the other classical political economists.
↑ Arthur, Christopher (2004). The new dialectic and Marx capital. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. tr. 232–233, 8.
↑ Louis, Althusser; Balibar, Etienne (1979). Reading Capital. Verso Editions. tr. 158. OCLC216233458. 'To criticize Political Economy' means to confront it with a new problematic and a new object: i.e., to question the very object of Political Economy
↑ Marx. “Grundrisse”. Lưu trữ bản gốc ngày 2 tháng 2 năm 2002. The aim is, rather, to present production – see e.g. Mill – as distinct from distribution, etc., as encased in eternal natural laws independent of history, at which opportunity bourgeois relations are then quietly smuggled in as the inviolable natural laws on which society in the abstract is founded. This is the more or less conscious purpose of the whole proceeding. In distribution, by contrast, humanity has allegedly permitted itself to be considerably more arbitrary. Quite apart from this crude tearing-apart of production and distribution and of their real relationship, it must be apparent from the outset that, no matter how different distribution may have been arranged in different stages of social development, it must be possible here also, just as with production, to single out common characteristics, and just as possible to confound or to extinguish all historic differences under general human laws.
↑ Henderson, Willie (2000). John Ruskin's political economy. London: Routledge. ISBN0-203-15946-2. OCLC48139638. It could be argued that Ruskin, like Plato, is addressing the problems of society as a whole rather than addressing economic issues. Nonetheless, he approaches such concerns through a critique of political economy.
